So over the past week, I have been obsessed with keyboards. I wrote a
review for my old trusted CT-670 here, while I lusted after younger, sexier, and high maintenance models. I haven't actually used any of these boards. . . so these are just my theoretical opinions.
It all began when I visited the music store last weekend. That's when the bug bit me. Since then, I have been looking through the feature sets of potential keyboards I'd like to buy. Tweaks Guide recommends the
Juno-D as a low end studio keyboard. Without having played it yet, my impression is that it is a very good value for money in terms of features and sound. It seems to be perfect as a MIDI controller, and for playing along with bands, with its awesome sound making potential. It has some in built rhythms, which can be played using different drum-sets, but the auto-accompaniment isn't what I as a fingered-chord player am used to. It does have a bunch of preset arpeggiations though. . .which would add loads of style to any performance. If it didn't feel like cheating to be using these pre-programmed flourishes instead of actually playing it. The Juno also has some very nice controllers. . . I particularly like Rolands D-Beam which allows one to control modulations using an infrared sensor. . .that detects your hand movements over it. It must look cool on stage to be doing that. The damage: c.a. 600$.
There was an awesome deal on the
Triton 61-key LE. Selling at 1000$ it seemed to have most things Triton, without the sampling component, which can be obtained with an upgrade. People seem somewhat dissatisfied with the piano sound. But in terms of features, it seems to have all the synthesizing functions of Juno D, with an additional 16 track sequencer and external memory built in. Most of the presets appear to be better tuned for dance music. The Triton workstations are a bit of an industry standard. . .some people sell all their equipment and buy one of these . To some extent, the cost is because of the cool Triton sounds. . .and I obsessed about its plethora of features for a while. . .but figured I don't need my music to have their sound. Any good piano will do.
Which finally brought me to writing my review for my old and trusted CT-670. While writing it, at the end, I wrote a little wishlist of what I wanted in my keyboard. And this prompted to me to check out the gear Casio has been churning out recently. It seems, that they have taken every suggestion of mine and implemented it. In the lower price ranges, I think Casio has better sound than Yamaha, or Kawaii. And the features appear less gimicky and more sensible. I zeroed in on their high end
WK-3500 model, featuring velocity sensitive keys, smart media and floppy drive storage, functionality to create your own rhythms, 6 track sequencing, pitch and modulation wheel, GM compatibility, and small time synthesizing capabilities. For 400$ it seems like huge bang for the buck, and the reviews are all stellar. So this is the board I am currently drooling over. . .I can totally see this complimenting my computer music making home studio set up, and for small gigs. It's not considered a studio level keyboard, but I don't care about these labels. As
Amlan might say. . .they are mere social constructs.
Now I have to hold on to my horses, and not buy the keyboard until my heart has calmed down and stopped lusting, and my head is back in charge.
I also read somewhere that my CT-670 is now considered "vintage". Apparently they sell like hot cakes on e-bay. I'll hold on to it and wait for Antiques Roadshow to come to town.
Labels: Music